Validated accuracy

Professor's marks vs AssignOwl.

Real assignments, marked by real professors at Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Imperial College London, and Edinburgh — set side by side with what AssignOwl predicted. Toggle each card to compare.

±10%

Every prediction landed within this of the real mark

5/5

Assignments accurately assessed

2.4 pts

Average gap from the professor's score

Philosophy essay — ethical arguments

Philosophy · University of Oxford

-3 pts
Professor's marks for Philosophy essay — ethical arguments

Professor

74%

AssignOwl

71%

Professor

74%

Gap

-3

AI assessment closely matched the professor's evaluation of argument structure and critical analysis.

Computer science — algorithm design

Computer Science · Imperial College London

+3 pts
Professor's marks for Computer science — algorithm design

Professor

58%

AssignOwl

61%

Professor

58%

Gap

+3

Near-perfect alignment in code efficiency and algorithmic complexity assessment.

Biology lab report — cell biology

Biology · University of Cambridge

+1 pts
Professor's marks for Biology lab report — cell biology

Professor

64%

AssignOwl

65%

Professor

64%

Gap

+1

AI detected strong methodology that aligned with the professor's grading criteria.

Business strategy — market analysis

Business · London School of Economics

-4 pts
Professor's marks for Business strategy — market analysis

Professor

68%

AssignOwl

64%

Professor

68%

Gap

-4

Consistent evaluation of data analysis and strategic recommendations.

English literature — Victorian poetry

English · University of Edinburgh

-1 pts
Professor's marks for English literature — Victorian poetry

Professor

65%

AssignOwl

64%

Professor

65%

Gap

-1

AI accurately assessed literary analysis depth and critical interpretation.

See it on your own work.

Upload a draft and get the same honest, professor-grade read — before you submit.

Check your draft — free